Question about Professional Practice

mga sir ask po ako ng question.
my rights po ba ang mga client na mabigyan ng original copy of plan.. o humingi po sila nito sa architects/author of the plan. partaining po about the rights of the client in terms of architectural documents.

They are paying for the that together with the services of an architect. Of course meron right. 

Sila ang author of the plan. Nandyan ang pangalan nila as owner, dyan ang pangalan ng architect and engineer as the one who did the plan. 

Medyo magulo ang question mo, ano ang goal mo for this question? 

If iba ang may-ari ng plan, iba ang owner na nakalagay, wala silang right to have it.

pasensya po sa magugulo kong question sir.
may nagtanung po kasi sa akin about kung my rights ba ung client na humingi ng original copy ng plan. like ung nasa tracing paper po. may karapan po ba silang hingiin ung original copy mo na nasa tracing paper.?


di po ba blueprints copy lang po ang mga binibigay sa mga clients.

at nagulhan po kasi ako dito. "copyright ownership and ownership copy".

Kung ganun lang pala. Pwedeng pwede. Paprint ka nalang ulit ng isa pa kung tracing paper pala.

there will always be 1 only original of any plans, a client can only request a copy or in pinas a blueprint copy of any plans.
the originals are the intellectual property of the architect. UAP documents has a lot of similarity with AIA documents.
if a copy is requested by client, a client can do so at any time, and not the originals.
he originals remains with the architect. the originals itself is not a valid document, its just like the ink and tracing paper used,
it can only become once sealed and signed, the originals are instrument of service.

thank you po sir bokkins

and thank you rin sir ciaoriki nakuha ko po ung point, now malinaw na po skin ito. ito po kasi ung topic naming hinde malinaw ang kasagutan ng mga kasama ko..

the plans in tracing paper are always be the property of the architect..only blue print should be given to the owner...