Pangarap kong bahay

First topic message reminder :

Mga master share k lng s inyo dream house ko in future pero bka hanggang pangarap lng to. Komento po mula s inyo ay mluwag
kung tatanggapin pra mpaganda p lalo ang gawa ko...Rendering and Design...S San fernando city of Pampanga po site nito.
Avida po pero s tingin ko di papasa s municipality s design requirements...modify k n lng...hope u like it........

arkiedmund wrote:Ok lang yan sir austria, at least we are exchanging ideas...ok lang naman maging wild tayo sa design, since yun ang work natin. Pero, dapat isipin din natin habang nagdedesign, kung yung gagawin ba natin madaling i-maintain? kung, ito ba ay maiibigan ng ating client? I have nothing against your idea, more on just inquiring lang naman kung may purpose yung isang architectural element na nasa isang structure.

In my current office, madalas wild ang mga design ideas ng mga designers namin, pero, kahit gaano pa man ka unique yung mga gawa nila, sinisimplify nalang in the end, due to many factors.

Looking forward sa magiging final outcome nitong gawa mo sir...

Uu nmn s ganitong pag uusap I believe n mraming mtutunan ang readers ntn d b? sinabi k nmn at the beginning n bka di ma approve ng municipality...di bale design stage p nmn to eh im sure mbabago p to..at lst may origianal sya n design then revise k n lng...wla po itong client ako po owner nto kya nga ginwa k dto ung gusto k eh.
expalain k n rin kung bakit sya nbuo s isip ko n may 3 slabs s roof ko...When i sketch my design I found out n may vertical
element in the middle so I was thinking to break it with horizontal elements...so ayon nbuo ung concept n may 3 slabs on top..so I let my mind to flow kc alam ko I revise k nmn eh...Slamat sir arkiedmund naintindihan m ako...cge po pkita k po latest design nto...God bless everybody

silvercrown wrote:A very good start bro... and it's your dream house
maliit ata garage bro, di ka makalabas pag pinasok mo oto mo, reserve the bollards on your lawn...
let your creative juices flow, malayo mararating netong design mo bro...

Thank u so much bro...khit papaano gaganhan dn ako s words nyo minsan tintmad n kc ako i design to kya lng pini pressure n ako n misis eh. Garage po tama nmn po sya malaki lng ang car now k lng npansin di k ni render ulit tgal kc render times nto eh.
tama k wla p kc ako maisip s frontage k kya swing muna nilgay ko...mraming slamat ulit mrami tlga kc i consider k rin budget ko...hayyy sna mtapos n po...

dickie_ilagan wrote:all said nothing left...
just do better next time, dude...
kaya mo yan..!!!

Sorry for late response!!! aniwe mraming slamat bro!!! Maybe ur ryt I need to practice more harder pa...thanks a lot s pagdaan

tol sana matupad ang pangarap mo.......


nice bro ......
comments nasabi na nila.......
i like the 2nd image......

AUSTRIA wrote:cmmon we are architects di kailangan n may way of thinking tyo n dpat 2.10 ang door or kailangan ganito kc sbi ng building code so nagdedesign n tyo pra s building code...so hanggang dito n lng tyo kupya at revise n lng pla

bro you're going too far on this... building codes are there for a reason. to give credits to those people behind it pinaghirapan nila yan dude and pinag-aralan not just to put some rules with no basis at all. and if we are considering building codes on our designs does it makes us mangongopya? wag ganun bro... hindi ba't magaling ang designer kung ang mga rules and regulations ay nasusunod nya pero nagagawa pa rin nyang palabasin ang kanyang design? and sa panahaon ngayon bro... wala pa akong nakita na original ang design. one way or another merong kinuhang concept sa isang design then mix lang sa designer's concept kaya hindi mo pa rin masasabing original. sabi nga... you can easily recognized a good designer from the rest by just merely looking at his/her reference. even in design there are rules on which we must follow bro, tama ka as an architect and designer you should let your creative juices flow but not to the extent na you will give it as a reason kahit hindi na feasible ung design. hope makatulong bro.

kietsmark wrote:

AUSTRIA wrote:cmmon we are architects di kailangan n may way of thinking tyo n dpat 2.10 ang door or kailangan ganito kc sbi ng building code so nagdedesign n tyo pra s building code...so hanggang dito n lng tyo kupya at revise n lng pla

bro you're going too far on this... building codes are there for a reason. to give credits to those people behind it pinaghirapan nila yan dude and pinag-aralan not just to put some rules with no basis at all. and if we are considering building codes on our designs does it makes us mangongopya? wag ganun bro... hindi ba't magaling ang designer kung ang mga rules and regulations ay nasusunod nya pero nagagawa pa rin nyang palabasin ang kanyang design? and sa panahaon ngayon bro... wala pa akong nakita na original ang design. one way or another merong kinuhang concept sa isang design then mix lang sa designer's concept kaya hindi mo pa rin masasabing original. sabi nga... you can easily recognized a good designer from the rest by just merely looking at his/her reference. even in design there are rules on which we must follow bro, tama ka as an architect and designer you should let your creative juices flow but not to the extent na you will give it as a reason kahit hindi na feasible ung design. hope makatulong bro.

Thanks s comments bro maybe kya ko to nsasabi to basis dun s nbabasa ko kya Im going too far. (Paliwangan lng po to sir hah wlang hurt feelings Enjoy discussion lng po..)You remember Architect IM PEI greatest one Master of architecture npaanood k lng s Descovery channel to at nbasa k lng s Time magazine he always break the rules kc sbi nya kung may building regulation
plagi tayong susunod hanggang dito n lng ang Architecture bkit noon wla nmn yan eh kc pati architectural style pinapakiaalaman. One time there
is competition maybe you know Honcock building, one of the condition of the competition is the architectural style must be reflect the site and the site is classical architecture.But he dont like to make his design classical architecture, so what he did
is gumawa sya ng puro salamin n building n a no ribs shown....Nkakatawa kc nga nmn he reflect the site...And sya ang nanalo.
Im very glad when IM PEI said ARCHITECTURE IS CONTINOUSLY CHANGING...Ang louvere PAris Museum alam m b ang dahilan kung bkit under ground building un? kc ayw nya sumunod s architecture n existing dun so ginwa nya nilagay nya s underground. Im nothing against with Building code pinag aralan k rin yan pero alm k rin kung bkit ganun ang rule nla nkakalungkot pero ganun tlga eh...Slamat bro sports lng hah

sir bong, looking at your design (very creative, i admire your vigilante move, hehehe, kidding aside, some parts of your design is not practical, like canopy/eaves. Double check on your proportions, like window opening, carpark area and your main entry door, again your entourage - contrast and shades). then on your rendering, nasunog lang pow. mapping issues also. makukuha mo rin yan bro, lapit kana. practice lang nang practice and visit every section sa cgpinoy. dito lang rin me natuto, dami parin akong kakaining vertices, polygon, mesh at splines, hehehe. keep on posting sir. kita kits soon. god bless

galing!! Unique!!!

mganda ung concept nyo sir...solid at void...expresionist ang dating saken...kaso lang ung concept na floating volume medyo kinulang sa void...nging puro solid,mas aangat ung concept mo if ull add up some void pa...i get ur point in your concept...try to putting some void in your first floor to make the effect you really want...yan ung madalas na gamiting concept ni Archt. Richard Meier...why not try solid with curves...to soften ur solid if u want pero over all ok na sya...

mammoo_03 wrote:sir bong, looking at your design (very creative, i admire your vigilante move, hehehe, kidding aside, some parts of your design is not practical, like canopy/eaves. Double check on your proportions, like window opening, carpark area and your main entry door, again your entourage - contrast and shades). then on your rendering, nasunog lang pow. mapping issues also. makukuha mo rin yan bro, lapit kana. practice lang nang practice and visit every section sa cgpinoy. dito lang rin me natuto, dami parin akong kakaining vertices, polygon, mesh at splines, hehehe. keep on posting sir. kita kits soon. god bless

Tama k sir mac at the beginning alam k n di praktikal pero kya nga Dream House title nto kc bka hanggang pangarap n lng..
Kilala m nmn ako d b nagksma n tyo s work kya nga pati board exam ko Weird dn disign nun pero thanks God di nmn ako nabigo
kc ung ang dahilan kung bkit ako pumsa...pero syempre tama k mdami png screenong mrarating ito....mdami p revision thanks aniwe..

jenaro wrote:mganda ung concept nyo sir...solid at void...expresionist ang dating saken...kaso lang ung concept na floating volume medyo kinulang sa void...nging puro solid,mas aangat ung concept mo if ull add up some void pa...i get ur point in your concept...try to putting some void in your first floor to make the effect you really want...yan ung madalas na gamiting concept ni Archt. Richard Meier...why not try solid with curves...to soften ur solid if u want pero over all ok na sya...

Ummm...wait medyo ok ung suggestion m ah..cge try k ulit layout ung perspective...thanks

kietsmark wrote:

AUSTRIA wrote:cmmon we are architects di kailangan n may way of thinking tyo n dpat 2.10 ang door or kailangan ganito kc sbi ng building code so nagdedesign n tyo pra s building code...so hanggang dito n lng tyo kupya at revise n lng pla

bro you're going too far on this... building codes are there for a reason. to give credits to those people behind it pinaghirapan nila yan dude and pinag-aralan not just to put some rules with no basis at all. and if we are considering building codes on our designs does it makes us mangongopya? wag ganun bro... hindi ba't magaling ang designer kung ang mga rules and regulations ay nasusunod nya pero nagagawa pa rin nyang palabasin ang kanyang design? and sa panahaon ngayon bro... wala pa akong nakita na original ang design. one way or another merong kinuhang concept sa isang design then mix lang sa designer's concept kaya hindi mo pa rin masasabing original. sabi nga... you can easily recognized a good designer from the rest by just merely looking at his/her reference. even in design there are rules on which we must follow bro, tama ka as an architect and designer you should let your creative juices flow but not to the extent na you will give it as a reason kahit hindi na feasible ung design. hope makatulong bro.

Thanks s comments bro maybe kya ko to nsasabi to basis dun s nbabasa ko kya Im going too far. (Paliwangan lng po to sir hah wlang hurt feelings Enjoy discussion lng po..)You remember Architect IM PEI greatest one Master of architecture npaanood k lng s Descovery channel to at nbasa k lng s Time magazine he always break the rules kc sbi nya kung may building regulation
plagi tayong susunod hanggang dito n lng ang Architecture bkit noon wla nmn yan eh kc pati architectural style pinapakiaalaman. One time there
is competition maybe you know Honcock building, one of the condition of the competition is the architectural style must be reflect the site and the site is classical architecture.But he dont like to make his design classical architecture, so what he did
is gumawa sya ng puro salamin n building n a no ribs shown....Nkakatawa kc nga nmn he reflect the site...And sya ang nanalo.
Im very glad when IM PEI said ARCHITECTURE IS CONTINOUSLY CHANGING...Ang louvere PAris Museum alam m b ang dahilan kung bkit under ground building un? kc ayw nya sumunod s architecture n existing dun so ginwa nya nilagay nya s underground. Im nothing against with Building code pinag aralan k rin yan pero alm k rin kung bkit ganun ang rule nla nkakalungkot pero ganun tlga eh...Slamat bro sports lng hah

sir matanong ko lang po, anu po bang provision sa building code ang ayaw nyo? paki-explain po kung bakit para maintindihan natin...

mgkakasundo tyo sir...isa din kasi ako sa mga malilikot ang isip sa design...panalo un sir...mas lilitaw ung concept mo sa pagdagdag ng void sa design...

mga sir regarding sa codes eh pede ka naman sumunod pero it donst mean na di ka na makakagawa ng new inovative way...for example 2.1 sa door given na un as a architect/designer why not try to create a door not rectangular in shape...pasok ka na sa provision di pa nakahon ang design mo...walang mali sa pagsunod sa codes pero kung wala naman provision na rect ang door eh di gawin nateng circle...di naman pinagbawal un...

AUSTRIA wrote:

kietsmark wrote:

AUSTRIA wrote:cmmon we are architects di kailangan n may way of thinking tyo n dpat 2.10 ang door or kailangan ganito kc sbi ng building code so nagdedesign n tyo pra s building code...so hanggang dito n lng tyo kupya at revise n lng pla

bro you're going too far on this... building codes are there for a reason. to give credits to those people behind it pinaghirapan nila yan dude and pinag-aralan not just to put some rules with no basis at all. and if we are considering building codes on our designs does it makes us mangongopya? wag ganun bro... hindi ba't magaling ang designer kung ang mga rules and regulations ay nasusunod nya pero nagagawa pa rin nyang palabasin ang kanyang design? and sa panahaon ngayon bro... wala pa akong nakita na original ang design. one way or another merong kinuhang concept sa isang design then mix lang sa designer's concept kaya hindi mo pa rin masasabing original. sabi nga... you can easily recognized a good designer from the rest by just merely looking at his/her reference. even in design there are rules on which we must follow bro, tama ka as an architect and designer you should let your creative juices flow but not to the extent na you will give it as a reason kahit hindi na feasible ung design. hope makatulong bro.

Thanks s comments bro maybe kya ko to nsasabi to basis dun s nbabasa ko kya Im going too far. (Paliwangan lng po to sir hah wlang hurt feelings Enjoy discussion lng po..)You remember Architect IM PEI greatest one Master of architecture npaanood k lng s Descovery channel to at nbasa k lng s Time magazine he always break the rules kc sbi nya kung may building regulation
plagi tayong susunod hanggang dito n lng ang Architecture bkit noon wla nmn yan eh kc pati architectural style pinapakiaalaman. One time there
is competition maybe you know Honcock building, one of the condition of the competition is the architectural style must be reflect the site and the site is classical architecture.But he dont like to make his design classical architecture, so what he did
is gumawa sya ng puro salamin n building n a no ribs shown....Nkakatawa kc nga nmn he reflect the site...And sya ang nanalo.
Im very glad when IM PEI said ARCHITECTURE IS CONTINOUSLY CHANGING...Ang louvere PAris Museum alam m b ang dahilan kung bkit under ground building un? kc ayw nya sumunod s architecture n existing dun so ginwa nya nilagay nya s underground. Im nothing against with Building code pinag aralan k rin yan pero alm k rin kung bkit ganun ang rule nla nkakalungkot pero ganun tlga eh...Slamat bro sports lng hah

no need to mention sports lang bro kasi given na yan lalo na sa mga forums na katulad nito IM PEI said architecture is continously changing because CHANGE is the only permanent in this world of ours. Kahit dito bro sa Qatar merong project si IM PEI na library... the design is exceptional pero alam mo ba na napakaraming arabs na nagsasabi na sana makita pa rin sa mga future projects ung arabic architecture kasi unti-unti ng nawawala... and worst... ang tagal natapos kasi wala naman dito ung materials na gusto nya hehehe and i guess the way "great architects" defend their design what makes them extra-ordinaire. as what i've said... we should know and respect rules... dati talaga wala namang building code in obvious reason. walang board exam... kung walang exam ano ang pagbabasehan mo ng tanong... kung walang tanong anong e-exam? can you further explain bro kung bakit nakakalingkot ung rules? para ma enlighten naman ako bro... thanks

jenaro wrote:mga sir regarding sa codes eh pede ka naman sumunod pero it donst mean na di ka na makakagawa ng new inovative way...for example 2.1 sa door given na un as a architect/designer why not try to create a door not rectangular in shape...pasok ka na sa provision di pa nakahon ang design mo...walang mali sa pagsunod sa codes pero kung wala naman provision na rect ang door eh di gawin nateng circle...di naman pinagbawal un...

kaya nga bro... mas mahusay ang architect or designer kung nasusunod nya ang building codes and yet napapalabas pa nya ang gusto nyang design. mas challenging nga ung ganun e... dalawa na iisipin mo... kung paano susundin ung rules and kung paano ilalagay ung design mo.

mahusay pala ako sir!hehehhehe...kasi lahat ng nasa code ngcocompliment sa design ko ang i dont consider it a limitation ung mga codes...actually marami na akong codes na hinanapan ng butas at ung butas na un eh un ang gate way ko to design my own...

As my experience s Building code minsan may project kmi commercial building paulit ulit ang design di ma approve ng client kc npaka simple dw sbi nmn kc yan sbi ng building code kailangan ntn sumunod...regarding facade hah...Generally s mga building code dimension meron silang standard alam nyo b kung bakit? Kc un ang sukat ng plywood pra sakto nga nmn eh papaano kung di mganda s elevation susunod k p rin?eh design rules b un? wla k n mgawa kc ung ang sbi s building code. dpat nag strict
sila s lot setbacks at orientation agree ako dun...paano kung hinihingi ng facade ko eh kailngan k ng cantilever n hang over di n nmn pwede kc nag exceed dw ako s property line...alam nyo b bro s Singapore I admire most kc dun lng ako nkakita ng train n pumapasok s building no restriction....government project or private magkakasundo..bkit nmn nla ngawa? Rules s pinas I dont think so kya nagiging ugat n rin sya ng lagayan ng pera.I believe in zoning pero minsan may nkakalusot din bkit? ayaw k n lng magsalita mhirap n.Sna maliwanagn k bro kc un nging experience k s knila.

maliit na kalaye,malakingkotse,makitid na kwuarto o mapaglarong kanto??,,
bagamat ganto,,Mahusay kapa saken,,,

jenaro wrote:mahusay pala ako sir!hehehhehe...kasi lahat ng nasa code ngcocompliment sa design ko ang i dont consider it a limitation ung mga codes...actually marami na akong codes na hinanapan ng butas at ung butas na un eh un ang gate way ko to design my own...

well... let the people around you be the judge for that hehehe

mkikisali lng mga sir... ang akin lng
ang building code ay gnwa for the safety,security,comfort and specially sa satisfactory ng client or ung my ari ng structure na denedesign ntng lht mga architect.. malaking factor tlga na maimplement ang ating design and concept for every project we hav... i rili envy sir austria for believing sa design nia and wla ako tutol dun sir... cgro kya ganto lng tau kse hndi tlga tau macoconvince ng bwt isa or ibng tao man kse we believe in ourselves... its a good thing to hav this conversation... d tau nagpupumilit maniwla sa mga snsbi ng bwt member d2 kundi shineshare natn ang ating mga diffrent sides... as for me.. ive design houses n dn and i also consider building codes and at the same time thinking ways how to make the building codes not to affect my design, npka important tlga skn nun... i hope iv shared good enuf

kung minsan nkakapagod n mag drawing ng guidelines n 2.10,2.70,.60,1.00,.90 kc sbi ng building code...hayyy

AUSTRIA wrote:As my experience s Building code minsan may project kmi commercial building paulit ulit ang design di ma approve ng client kc npaka simple dw sbi nmn kc yan sbi ng building code kailangan ntn sumunod...regarding facade hah...Generally s mga building code dimension meron silang standard alam nyo b kung bakit? Kc un ang sukat ng plywood pra sakto nga nmn eh papaano kung di mganda s elevation susunod k p rin?eh design rules b un? wla k n mgawa kc ung ang sbi s building code.

di ko naintindihan to bro, paki-detalye naman, at makapagbigay tayo ng magandang suggestion or comment...

AUSTRIA wrote:dpat nag strictsila s lot setbacks at orientation agree ako dun...paano kung hinihingi ng facade ko eh kailngan k ng cantilever n hang over di n nmn pwede kc nag exceed dw ako s property line...

talagang di pepwede yan bro, kaya nga property line e, kse hanggang dun lang pag-aari mo... kung talagang kelangan mo ng canopy or cantilever, i-move mo ang structure to accomodate your design requirements... wala akong nkikitang hadlang dun...

AUSTRIA wrote:alam nyo b bro s Singapore I admire most kc dun lng ako nkakita ng train n pumapasok s building no restriction....government project or private magkakasundo..bkit nmn nla ngawa? Rules s pinas I dont think so kya nagiging ugat n rin sya ng lagayan ng pera.I believe in zoning pero minsan may nkakalusot din bkit? ayaw k n lng magsalita mhirap n.Sna maliwanagn k bro kc un nging experience k s knila.

wala naman cgurong provision sa building code na humahadlang sa ganitong endeavor ng public at private sector bro... in fact halos ganito rin sa atin, yung malalaking mall, may PUV/PUB terminals being operated ang regulated by the government... halos pareho ang concept ng sa singapore... train nga lng sa kanila...

mga sir its depend!its dependot!depende sa codes depende sa provision,depende sa country,kasi sa pinas iba...di lang codes sinusunod dun pati city ordinance...kung iisipin nyo mga sir national bldg code vs ang municipal ordinance...sino dapat masunod?both of you has its point...kaya na kayo!hehehehheheh...case to case basis lahat...

May "Air right building" n b dto s pinas? structure along the way? wla p d b? kc government property dw...bkit di pwede ang overhang? So bkit s ibang bansa pwede? bkit di pwede s atin? meron n b dito s pinas n train n tumatagos s building? Saan?