Condo Lobby _ Update

First topic message reminder :

hi guys tagal na walng post ito share ko lng tng lobby renovation Max vray PS C&C r welcome

[img][/img]

Salamat sa mga nagcomment, ito nga pala yng Update my mga nabago ng kunti. nabago ko na din yng BG madalian kc kaya d ko na napansin hehehe... tnx to all

[img][/img]

much better dude!

Nice update bro.I like it even the first one.Keep it up bro and Goodluck!

bokkins wrote:Ibang klase to ah, kaya pala talaga mong nawala. gusto ko to. sarap sa mata. sosyal na homy ang dating. thanks for sharing bro. another reference na naman to. hehe. keep it up!

thanks sir bokkins sa pagdaan

christine wrote:wow lupit pareng jay

salamat mareng tin sa pagbisita next tym ulit

pakunat wrote:ayos dre. naku ito k nanaman. kulang na lang ung grout sa floor. more shots dre. kuripot nman yan. hehehe. ingat dre

parekoy salamat sa pagdaan, musta sa bagong work natin hehehe... ingat din parekoy salamat ulit

vamp_lestat wrote:wow.. master jay.. galing neto.. it is photoreal to me.. magaling2x... it relates sa background mo.. swak na swak.. ano po un? jpeg na ba lahat or a combination of mesh...

arc mesh lng yng BG ko, salamat sa pagdaan bro next tym ulit na post

B_L_O_Q wrote:sir jay ang tindi nmn nitong banat m n to.... ibang klaseng level kna tlaga

thanks bro next tym ulit na post

Noel_Diaz wrote:wow very nice composition sir,,, realistic nato sir,, superb, keep it up sir!!!

salamat bro sa pagbisita

W W... Basta obra ni master jay maLufet!....

dickie_ilagan wrote:looks elegant...
post ka wires and settings

salamat parekoy cge post ko pag d nko bc ha tnx ulit

jarul wrote:ung update grabe,,totoo na tlga,,,,

salamat ulit bro

glensky wrote:well balance lighting,details and design are good.

jay3design wrote:hi guys tagal na walng post ito share ko lng tng lobby renovation Max vray PS C&C r welcome

[img][/img]

Salamat sa mga nagcomment, ito nga pala yng Update my mga nabago ng kunti. nabago ko na din yng BG madalian kc kaya d ko na napansin hehehe... tnx to all

[img][/img]

salamat sir glensky

pintura wrote:anggaling mo talaga sir jay!pahipo naman ng kamay mo heheheh..lupit mo talaga

salamat bro next time ulit, musta na d na tayo nagkikita kita ulit sa pagkuha ng T-shirt EB daw sabi ni sir glenn

galing mo sir jay! very well lighted yung scene, natural na natural tingnan.. keep it up sir!!

RATING based on a 100pt sore system that I am testing out to make it easier for people who are busy and don't have much rime to leave a comment that at least shows what area of the rendering is good or not so good.

100pts breakdown

20% = modeling (M)
25% = texturing and materials (T)
25% = lighting (L)
10% = entourage (E)
10% = composition and story (CS)
10% = x-factor or overall wow effect (X)

Multiply this total by the degree of difficulty (0.9 being the simplest model and 1.0 being the hardest/more complex scenes)

So for this rendering:

M = 20
T = 23
L = 24
E = 9
C = 10
X = 10
SUB-TOTAL = 96
Degree of Difficulty = .95
TOTAL SCORE = 91.2

0 - 25 pts = very poor
26 - 50 pts = poor
51 - 65 pts = average
66 - 80 pts = good
81 - 90 pts = very good
91 - 100 pts = excellent

To all those confused about the numerical scoring, its just an idea to pass along C&C without any personal attachment or subjective tone. A number is a number, it does not say "panget" or "hayop sa galing" but is just a number void of any emotion and is more measurable than an emotional comment like "galing" or "hanep". I would assume people in this forum would be mature enough to appreciate a straight forward analysis such as this once they place "C&C welcome" in their post and not get offended by the lack of patronization, or am I being too optimistic?

LWF

LWF wrote:RATING based on a 100pt sore system that I am testing out to make it easier for people who are busy and don't have much rime to leave a comment that at least shows what area of the rendering is good or not so good.

100pts breakdown

20% = modeling (M)
25% = texturing and materials (T)
25% = lighting (L)
10% = entourage (E)
10% = composition and story (CS)
10% = x-factor or overall wow effect (X)

Multiply this total by the degree of difficulty (0.9 being the simplest model and 1.0 being the hardest/more complex scenes)

So for this rendering:

M = 20
T = 23
L = 24
E = 9
C = 10
X = 10
SUB-TOTAL = 96
Degree of Difficulty = .95
TOTAL SCORE = 91.2

0 - 25 pts = very poor
26 - 50 pts = poor
51 - 65 pts = average
66 - 80 pts = good
81 - 90 pts = very good
91 - 100 pts = excellent

To all those confused about the numerical scoring, its just an idea to pass along C&C without any personal attachment or subjective tone. A number is a number, it does not say "panget" or "hayop sa galing" but is just a number void of any emotion and is more measurable than an emotional comment like "galing" or "hanep". I would assume people in this forum would be mature enough to appreciate a straight forward analysis such as this once they place "C&C welcome" in their post and not get offended by the lack of patronization, or am I being too optimistic?

LWF

sir jay, pasensya ha OT lang ako saglit.. hehehe..

sorry sir LWF pero mahina ako sa math eh, and i think this pts thing is to time consuming, might just as well tell whats wrong and suggest how to improve it directly, not just leave a score and left the guy hanging..

abl_langs wrote:

LWF wrote:RATING based on a 100pt sore system that I am testing out to make it easier for people who are busy and don't have much rime to leave a comment that at least shows what area of the rendering is good or not so good.

100pts breakdown

20% = modeling (M)
25% = texturing and materials (T)
25% = lighting (L)
10% = entourage (E)
10% = composition and story (CS)
10% = x-factor or overall wow effect (X)

Multiply this total by the degree of difficulty (0.9 being the simplest model and 1.0 being the hardest/more complex scenes)

So for this rendering:

M = 20
T = 23
L = 24
E = 9
C = 10
X = 10
SUB-TOTAL = 96
Degree of Difficulty = .95
TOTAL SCORE = 91.2

0 - 25 pts = very poor
26 - 50 pts = poor
51 - 65 pts = average
66 - 80 pts = good
81 - 90 pts = very good
91 - 100 pts = excellent

To all those confused about the numerical scoring, its just an idea to pass along C&C without any personal attachment or subjective tone. A number is a number, it does not say "panget" or "hayop sa galing" but is just a number void of any emotion and is more measurable than an emotional comment like "galing" or "hanep". I would assume people in this forum would be mature enough to appreciate a straight forward analysis such as this once they place "C&C welcome" in their post and not get offended by the lack of patronization, or am I being too optimistic?

LWF

sir jay, pasensya ha OT lang ako saglit.. hehehe..

sorry sir LWF pero mahina ako sa math eh, and i think this pts thing is to time consuming, might just as well tell whats wrong and suggest how to improve it directly, not just leave a score and left the guy hanging..

actually the points thing is very fast using cut and paste. i just change the numbers.

as for making detailed comments on renderings, please have mercy, that's what i do every day (that is actually true, i sort of manage multiple CG teams). anyway i will try my best to give more detailed comments when i have more time.

sidenote, the image above has very little flaws, the only thing that kept it from getting really, really high score is the degree of difficulty. the model is very good but not hard to build. there are not enough custom models that are intricate to warrant a higher difficulty rating.

LWF

hey jay, lighting is spot on.... very neat eye candy....

little OT
@ LWF
you're points system looks good on my monitor it's so technical but i doesnt really cover how the the TS got his hi & lows.. a straight forward CnC (IMHO) with little bits of hints on how to improve the visual will be much appreciated..

cge tol kita kits sa EB..hoy abel magcompute k kc yan tuloy bngyan k ng formula..tara abel mag-enroll tau sa lorong 28 balita ko magaling sla sa math dun

Ganda ng pag ka render ang linis! galing! gusto ko yung 2nd image. but may c&c lang ako.. ang chandelier hindi masyadong interesting tingnan maybe mahina ang lighting, at ang mga downlights parang flat ang ilaw.. parang walang effect sa scene..should reflect on the floor..opening sa gitna nakakatakot ang dilim. lastly sa flooring hindi makita ang dugtungan ng tiles or maybe ganyan lang talag ang design? yun lang po.. I hope makatulong and c&c ko. good luck!!

great reneder sir jds..walang katulad

parekoy!.......hataw gawa mo ah, galing ng lighting and scene composition...
tutorials naman jan hehehe.....

ARCHITHEKTHURA wrote:Nice update bro.I like it even the first one.Keep it up bro and Goodluck!

salamat parekoy sa pagdaan mo next time ulit

jiloskie wrote:W W... Basta obra ni master jay maLufet!....

salamat bro kaw naman hehehe... tnx ulit next time ulit

abl_langs wrote:galing mo sir jay! very well lighted yung scene, natural na natural tingnan.. keep it up sir!!

thanks bro sa pagbisita mo next time ulit friday yng EB natin

hi sir jay... very well executed sir! the flaws had been corrected already.

nice image sir!!!