Photography Challenge Monthly (February 2009)

tutik wrote:

tutik wrote:

ARCHITHEKTHURA wrote:Very busy these days..Try ko lng ulit sumali..hehehehehe.Thanks thanks thanks..
Fly high..

ang lufet! mapapa-zoo ako ng di oras nito Jeff!

Jeff cloned ba ung isa sa kanila? wala kc reflection ung nauuna saka saktong sakto eh?

edelrosario wrote:[img][/img]

Pasali po, rare and extraordinary kasi tong na-spot'an ko. a two color eyed cat. I do love animals and this one really caught my attention.
Canon 400D, 1/160s, f6.3 @ ISO 400, 200mm Telephoto lens, AP setting[img]I do love animals and this one really caught my attention.

arkiedmund wrote:@sir cubi_o:

I think you mean to say, that part of the image is not cloned..tama ba ako? he he he..may konting error sa comment..hahaha...

BACK TO TOPIC:
ok naman ah...maybe effect of the light and the position of the one taking the picture, kaya nawala yung shadows, or hindi makita yung shadow sa image.

I don't know, wala akong alam sa photography. But from the looks of it, I see that this is the real thing.

tutik wrote:guys i'll just wait for Jeff's take to be fair (it's not cleared yet Edmund!). please give me the benefit of the doubt i'm a big fan of this masterpiece but my eyes tells me that reflection is obviously missing in one of the ducks, the details are very identical (check bright pixels, feather patterns, irregularities--very consistent), the outline of the ducks are very consistent. even if he's using a super telephoto lens the ducks' pose should vary at least slightly in perspective. think of them in CG, you may probably wanna test modelling the duck then instance them to position, then establish the camera. even if you use a 800mm lens perspective will still distort their poses.

ARCHITHEKTHURA wrote:

tutik wrote:guys i'll just wait for Jeff's take to be fair (it's not cleared yet Edmund!). please give me the benefit of the doubt i'm a big fan of this masterpiece but my eyes tells me that reflection is obviously missing in one of the ducks, the details are very identical (check bright pixels, feather patterns, irregularities--very consistent), the outline of the ducks are very consistent. even if he's using a super telephoto lens the ducks' pose should vary at least slightly in perspective. think of them in CG, you may probably wanna test modelling the duck then instance them to position, then establish the camera. even if you use a 800mm lens perspective will still distort their poses.

Hi sirs!hehehe.Nagkagulo na pla dito..Anyways first i want to extend my apologies about this image.First,yeah i think i cloned the ducks here.I was editing a lot of images with these sets of photoshoot and yeah i remember trying to cloned the duck here to add some more nice moments. Then tin read about this and pm me to look at this thread. Then when i saw the challenge rules-oh my God! Sorry guys if i mislead you. It was not my intention to ruin the challenge. I was looking with my photos and I saw these kaya to naisip ko ipasok sa challenge without reading the challenge rules. Again if its ground for disqualification then its alright. No hard feelings. Again thanks guys and hoping for your kind consideration for this matter.

@ tutik-800mm?hehehehehe..wish ko lng!hehehehe. I was looking for 50-500mm sigma..oks kaya kaya yun?OT..hehehe..

ARCHITHEKTHURA wrote:

tutik wrote:guys i'll just wait for Jeff's take to be fair (it's not cleared yet Edmund!). please give me the benefit of the doubt i'm a big fan of this masterpiece but my eyes tells me that reflection is obviously missing in one of the ducks, the details are very identical (check bright pixels, feather patterns, irregularities--very consistent), the outline of the ducks are very consistent. even if he's using a super telephoto lens the ducks' pose should vary at least slightly in perspective. think of them in CG, you may probably wanna test modelling the duck then instance them to position, then establish the camera. even if you use a 800mm lens perspective will still distort their poses.

Hi sirs!hehehe.Nagkagulo na pla dito..Anyways first i want to extend my apologies about this image.First,yeah i think i cloned the ducks here.I was editing a lot of images with these sets of photoshoot and yeah i remember trying to cloned the duck here to add some more nice moments. Then tin read about this and pm me to look at this thread. Then when i saw the challenge rules-oh my God(Limit your photo editing to a minimum!) Sorry guys if i mislead you. It was not my intention to ruin the challenge. I was looking with my photos and I saw these kaya to naisip ko ipasok sa challenge without reading the challenge rules. Again if its ground for disqualification then its alright. No hard feelings. Again thanks guys and hoping for your kind consideration for this matter.



@ tutik-800mm?hehehehehe..wish ko lng!hehehehe. I was looking for 50-500mm sigma..oks kaya kaya yun?OT..hehehe..

torvicz wrote:hehe dude arki, alam naman naming ala kang masamang intensyon e...
magaling lang talaga tong si dude tutik, akalain mong di ko rin napansin..heheh although nung chineck ko sya naconclude ko agad na clone nga! hahaha, kaw talaga oh! napasobra ng konting konti lng naman sa editing, isa lang naman e, isang ibon lang naman..heheh joke lang dude arki..kahit naman dlawa lang maganda pa rin naman e...so don't worry since nag apologize ka naman agad cguro naman di ka disqualified nyan...

parehong pareho naman kase e, dapat nilagyan mo nalng ng reflection ung isa...hehehe to naman di pa niluboslubos...hehehe, joke! peace tayo ha?

torvicz wrote:iba talaga ang trained eye e....(refering to dude tutik)

tutik wrote:

torvicz wrote:iba talaga ang trained eye e....(refering to dude tutik)

tks dude! 70% ng trabaho ko ang mag scrutinize ng mga ganyan =) but kudos to Jeff for his honesty. in fact he's got a trained eye too coz he edited to improve his image (photographer with an edge). no respect lost to Jeff (but disqualified ka this month )

tutik wrote:

torvicz wrote:iba talaga ang trained eye e....(refering to dude tutik)

tks dude! 70% ng trabaho ko ang mag scrutinize ng mga ganyan =) but kudos to Jeff for his honesty. in fact he's got a trained eye too coz he edited to improve his image (photographer with an edge). no respect lost to Jeff (but disqualified ka this month )

tutik wrote:guys i'll just wait for Jeff's take to be fair (it's not cleared yet Edmund!). please give me the benefit of the doubt i'm a big fan of this masterpiece but my eyes tells me that reflection is obviously missing in one of the ducks, the details are very identical (check bright pixels, feather patterns, irregularities--very consistent), the outline of the ducks are very consistent. even if he's using a super telephoto lens the ducks' pose should vary at least slightly in perspective. think of them in CG, you may probably wanna test modelling the duck then instance them to position, then establish the camera. even if you use a 800mm lens perspective will still distort their poses.

arkiedmund wrote:

tutik wrote:guys i'll just wait for Jeff's take to be fair (it's not cleared yet Edmund!). please give me the benefit of the doubt i'm a big fan of this masterpiece but my eyes tells me that reflection is obviously missing in one of the ducks, the details are very identical (check bright pixels, feather patterns, irregularities--very consistent), the outline of the ducks are very consistent. even if he's using a super telephoto lens the ducks' pose should vary at least slightly in perspective. think of them in CG, you may probably wanna test modelling the duck then instance them to position, then establish the camera. even if you use a 800mm lens perspective will still distort their poses.

You mis-interpret me sir glenn...I was reffering to sir cubi_o's comment, not on the thread per se...hehehe....kasi, medyo may onting grammatical error yung naging comment ni sir cubi_o, kaya nagtanong ako, yun ang ibig kong sabihin dito...hehehe...

cubi_o: wrote:O.T rin
@ sir ed....
.... post ka nah...kahit ano. ika nga nila its not the camera sir..hehee


nxt entries please....